What do post-disaster reconstruction project success indicators look like? End-user's perspectives

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the emergence of new success measures for buildings and infrastructure post-disaster reconstruction projects, beyond the traditional iron triangle, which have gained prominence with the increased involvement of clients and end-users in these projects. Consequently, the industry is obliged to reconsider the critical factors regarding what constitutes a successful outcome from the perspectives of these stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach Data was gathered from end-users in four Caribbean islands using a questionnaire survey on eight empirical success indicators obtained from an extensive systematic literature review. To elicit a ranking and correlations amongst the end-user' perspectives on the indicators, factor analysis and structural equation modelling techniques (SEM) were conducted. Findings The factor analysis found safety to be the most important empirical success measure, while change ranked the least important. Correlation analysis using SEM identified two new composite indicators, namely, competence with delivering timely and quality environmentally friendly and sustainable projects and adaptability in ensuring project objectives reflect beneficiaries' expectations amidst internal and external influences, to be critical of end-users' measurement indicators that describe their assessment mechanism. Measurement and structural models validated safety and satisfaction to be the highest loading variables in the two composites, respectively. Research limitations/implications The research focussed on findings in English language articles; therefore, any claim to a complete list of indicators from the literature can be amiss. Practical implications Results confirm the traditional iron triangle of time, cost and quality to be limited in assessing reconstruction project outcomes and the views and expectations of the potential beneficiaries need to be factored in the planning, design, execution and post-handover stages in all reconstruction projects. Originality/value This paper was very specific in its attempt to investigate new success indicators for reconstruction project outcomes, aiming to assist with developing comprehensive project objectives that resonate with all stakeholder groups.

Automated summary

This study investigates new success indicators for reconstruction project outcomes by analyzing data from end-users in four Caribbean islands. The research found safety to be the most important empirical success measure, while change ranked the least important. The results suggest that the traditional iron triangle of time, cost, and quality may be limited in assessing reconstruction project outcomes.