4.2 Article

Who Has Trouble Hiring? Evidence from a National IT Survey

Journal

ILR REVIEW
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages 608-637

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0019793920985261

Keywords

information technology; hiring frictions; skill demands; human resource practices; monopsony

Funding

  1. Smith Richardson Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding hiring difficulties and hiring frictions is crucial for economic growth and individual success. This study suggests that persistent hiring difficulties are not strongly associated with technology or technical skill demands, but are more influenced by organizational attributes and market structure. Factors such as human resource practices, management strategy, and labor-market monopsony power play key roles in addressing workforce challenges.
Understanding hiring difficulties and the nature of hiring frictions that employers face is important for the promotion of economic growth and the individual success of both firms and workers. This study sheds light on this issue by presenting evidence from an original, nationally representative survey of information technology (IT) helpdesks that contains detailed measurements of skill requirements, organizational characteristics, and market structure. The results indicate that the incidence of persistent hiring difficulties is modest, and that measures of technology and technical skill demands are not associated with greater hiring problems. Organizational attributes and market structure are generally more predictive of hiring frictions than are skill requirements. Human resource practices, management strategy, and labor-market monopsony power all play key roles. These results cast doubt on simple stories about technology-driven hiring problems and point to the importance of examining a broader range of organizational and market factors when addressing workforce challenges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available