4.2 Article

Who Wants to Raise Taxes?

Journal

POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages 35-46

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1065912920977911

Keywords

public opinion; taxes; tax policy; state politics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individual-level and state-level factors influence public attitudes towards raising taxes. Partisanship, ideology, and self-interest play significant roles in people's responses. Democrats and liberals with fewer resources prefer tax increases and income tax hikes, while Republicans and conservatives with more resources prefer spending cuts and sales tax increases. Income tax increases and higher tax burdens correspond with preferences for cutting spending.
We test hypotheses about individual-level (partisanship and self-interest) and state-level (tax policy) factors that may shape public attitudes about raising taxes. Respondents were given a scenario where a state budget needed to be balanced with spending cuts or tax increases, and a scenario where either state sales or state income taxes would be increased. We find partisanship, ideology, and self-interest had substantial relationships with how people responded. Democrats, liberals, and those with fewer resources preferred tax increases over spending cuts, and preferred income tax increases over sales tax increases. Republicans (particularly wealthy Republicans), conservatives, and those with more resources preferred spending cuts to tax increases, and preferred sales tax increases over income tax increases. We also find income tax increases and higher tax burdens may correspond with preferences for cutting spending rather than raising taxes, but variation in the rates of a particular tax was not associated with attitudes about raising that tax. Our results suggest an electorate that may be somewhat more sophisticated about fiscal policy than what has been portrayed in several influential studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available