4.4 Article

You've Got Mail: a Daily Investigation of Email Demands on Job Tension and Work-Family Conflict

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 325-338

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-021-09748-1

Keywords

Email; Job demands; Work-family conflict; Job tension; Trait self-regulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the impact of email as a job demand on employees, and how it may negatively affect both work and family life. By integrating the job demands-resources model and spillover theory, it is found that email demands can have negative consequences on work and spill over into home life. The study also investigates trait self-regulation as a potential moderator.
Email represents a useful organizational tool that can facilitate rapid and flexible communication between organizations, managers, and employees regardless of their physical location (e.g., office, home, on vacation). However, despite the potential benefits of email, its usage is a double-edged sword that also has the potential to negatively affect its users. To advance knowledge and inform both researchers and practitioners of such negative outcomes, we integrate the job demands-resources model with spillover theory to investigate email as a potential job demand and explore how it may relate to employees' job tension and work-family conflict. Using an interval-contingent experience sampling methodology with respondents from two separate organizations (n = 134) providing 704 observations across 6 days of surveys, we hypothesize that, as a job demand, email can have negative consequences on the job that can spill over into the home. Furthermore, we also examine an individual trait (i.e., trait self-regulation) as a potential boundary condition that moderates the extent to which experienced tension from email demands spills over into home life. Finally, theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available