4.3 Article

Soil tillage and sugarcane planting: an assessment of cost and economic viability

Journal

SCIENTIA AGRICOLA
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

UNIV SAO PAOLO
DOI: 10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0317

Keywords

Saccharum spp; mechanization; variable rate; yield; profitability

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the costs and economic viability of different soil preparation and planting systems for sugarcane crops. The results show that localized soil preparation and mechanized planting are the least costly approaches. Medium-sized sugar mills are more economically viable compared to independent sugarcane producers.
Yield and profitability levels in sugarcane crops demonstrate the importance of the agricultural practices adopted, especially for soil preparation and planting systems. This study evaluated the costs involved in 40 alternative methods for the establishment of sugarcane crops resulting from the combination of eight soil preparation systems and five planting options, followed by an assessment of the economic viability of sugarcane production for suppliers and sugar mills. Data were collected from 31 sugar mills and 42 suppliers in Sao Paulo State, Brazil, from the 2016/17 season. The cost analysis and discounted cash flow analysis were used to calculate economic viability. Localized soil preparation with a fixed application rate of inputs (soil amendments) and mechanized planting with a variable application rate of fertilizers were the least costly systems to establish the sugarcane crop. Regarding the sugarcane establishment system, the medium-sized sugar mills were the most economically viable when compared to independent sugarcane producers. There was no significant difference in cost to establish sugarcane crops across the various sized groups of suppliers and we identified that costs rose as the size of the sugar mills increased.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available