4.2 Article

Who will be Asia's Next Unicorn? Comparing Marriage Equality in Taiwan with Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea

Journal

ASIAN STUDIES REVIEW
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 55-73

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10357823.2021.1920886

Keywords

Marriage equality; Taiwan; Hong Kong; Japan; South Korea; LGBTQ rights; human rights

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Taiwan became the first country in Asia to introduce same-sex marriage, thanks to long-term progress in LGBTQ rights and a broad coalition of supporters. The promotion of gender education has shaped a positive attitude towards marriage equality among the younger generation. Furthermore, discussions on rights need to be tailored to fit the country's culture and values.
In May 2019, Taiwan became the first country in Asia to introduce same-sex marriage. This article compares the path to same-sex marriage in Taiwan with the situation in three of its neighbours - Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea - where similar debates have proceeded without yet achieving marriage equality. Advocates for marriage equality in Taiwan's neighbours can learn some lessons from the experience of the island democracy. First, the struggle for marriage equality is a long-term effort that is built on progress in LGBTQ rights in general and on a broad coalition of supporters from civil society and political parties. Taiwan was already home to Asia's most vibrant LGBTQ community and movement, and has enacted anti-discrimination legislation. Second, the island has introduced gender education in schools, and this shaped the younger generation's positive attitude towards marriage equality. Third, discourses on rights need to be adapted to a country's culture and values. Taiwanese advocates for marriage equality not only talked about marriage equality as a fundamental human right but also stressed values such as mutual respect and a stable partnership and family.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available