4.5 Article

Synthesis and X-Ray Crystallographical Analysis of 5, 8-Dihydroxy-1, 4-Naphthoquinonne, Cobalt (II), Nickel (II) and Copper (II) Chelate Complexes

Journal

ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 535-541

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-021-05900-4

Keywords

Naphthazarin; Cobalt; Nickel; Copper; Chelates; XRD; Crystallography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study synthesized complexes of Co (II), Ni (II), Cu (II), and 5, 8-dihydroxy-1, 4-naphthoquinone in an efficient manner using simple inexpensive catalyst and base, and analyzed their crystal structures. The X-ray data revealed the cubic P lattices of all the polymetal chelates, with variations in interplaner spacing, unit cell dimensions, and density among the different metal chelates.
The complexes of Co (II), Ni (II), Cu (II) and 5, 8-dihydroxy-1, 4-naphthoquinone were prepared in an effective way of low cost and high yield using simple inexpensive catalyst (urea hydrogen peroxide) and a base t-BuOK. The polymetallic chelates of naphthazarin with cobalt (II), nickel (II) and copper (II), {[(C10H6O4)(3) (Co)(2) 4H(2)O] 3H(2)O, [(C10H6O4)(3) (Ni)(2) 4H(2)O]11/2H(2)O, [(C10H6O4)(3) (Cu)(2)] 4H(2)O} have been crystallographically defined and analysed applying the diffractograms data on the systems involved. The X-ray data helped settle on the cubic P lattices of all the polymetal chelates in preference to cubic F cubic I. The study further included the calculations on the interplaner spacing (d angstrom), density, unit cell (a angstrom) in which it had been found that d angstrom gets decreased with increasing value of n. The (a angstrom) for polycobalt chelate was the highest followed by polycopper and polynickel chelates, and the density values on these polymetal chelates assumed the similar order. The molecular weights of these chelate complexes show aligns with their formula weights.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available