3.8 Article

Towards a conceptual framework for non-financial reporting inclusive of pandemic and climate risk reporting

Journal

MEDITARI ACCOUNTANCY RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 710-738

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-11-2020-1097

Keywords

Risk reporting; Climate change; Materiality; Conceptual framework; Integrated reporting; Sustainable Development Goals; COVID-19

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper evaluates the adequacy of non-financial reporting frameworks in terms of risk reporting, particularly focusing on pandemic and climate change risks within three industries significantly affected by COVID-19 and climate change. It suggests a new definition of materiality and recommends placing sustainable development risks and opportunities at the core of a future framework for connected/integrated reporting.
Purpose This paper aims to evaluate non-financial reporting (NFR) frameworks insofar as risk reporting is concerned. This is facilitated through analysis of the adequacy of climate- and pandemic-related risk reporting in three industries that are both significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and are at risk from climate change. The pervasiveness of pandemic and climate-change risks have been highlighted in 2020, the hottest year on record and the year the COVID-19 pandemic struck. Stakeholders might reasonably expect reporting on these risks to have prepared them for the consequences. Design/methodology/approach The current debate on the complexity of sustainability and NFR frameworks/standards is critically analysed in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and calls to build back better. Context is provided through analysis of risk reporting by the ten largest airlines and the five largest companies in each of the hotel and cruise industries. Findings Risk reporting on two significant issues, pandemics and climate change, is woefully inadequate. While very little consideration has been given to pandemic risks, disclosures on climate-related risks focus predominantly on risks of increased regulation rather than physical risks, indicating a short-term focus. The disclosures are dispersed across different corporate reporting media and fail to appreciate the long-term consequences or offer solutions. Mindful that a conceptual framework for NFR must address this, the authors propose a new definition of materiality and recommend that sustainable development risks and opportunities be placed at the core of a future framework for connected/integrated reporting. Research limitations/implications For sustainable development risks to be perceived as real by managers, further research is needed to determine the nature and extent of key sustainable development risks and the most effective mitigation strategies. Social implications This paper highlights the importance of recognising the complexity of the issues facing organisations, society and the planet and addressing them by encouraging robust consideration of the interdependencies in evolving approaches to corporate reporting. Originality/value This study contributes to the current debate on the future of corporate reporting in light of two significant interconnected crises that threaten business and society - the pandemic and climate change. It provides evidence to support a long-term oriented and holistic approach to risk management and reporting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available