4.7 Article

Industrialization, servicification, and environmental Kuznets curve: non-linear panel regression analysis

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 6389-6398

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16012-9

Keywords

Environmental Kuznets Curve; Industrialization; Servicification; Panel smooth transition regression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the impact of income on CO2 emissions, and finds that countries with higher shares of manufacturing and industry sectors show a stronger sensitivity to income, while countries with a high level of servicification have a lower sensitivity. Therefore, when designing industrial policies, it is important to promote manufacturing and industrial sectors with lower carbon emissions for a more balanced consideration of emission reduction and development.
This paper investigates whether the impact of income on CO2 emissions is invariant to endogenously estimated threshold levels for the economic structure (ES) represented by value added in manufacturing, industry, and service sector shares in GDP for a panel of 54 economies over the 1971-2017 period. Our panel smooth transition regression estimation results strongly suggest that the sensitivity of CO2 emissions to income is substantially much higher in countries with higher manufacturing and industry sector shares, whilst it is much lower in servicified economies. Given the argument that manufacturing is the engine of growth, this finding may not necessarily downgrade the crucial importance of an industrial policy which places the manufacturing at the core. The empirical findings in this paper suggest that countries may better to design and implement a strategic and systematic industrial policy which promote the use of emission reduction technologies and encourage manufacturing and industrial sectors with lower carbon emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available