4.4 Article

On the Frequency Distribution of Geomagnetic K Indices in the Northwestern Pacific Region Over the 19-24 Solar Cycles

Journal

PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Volume 179, Issue 11, Pages 4179-4196

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-021-02862-4

Keywords

Geomagnetic activity; K index; Frequency distribution; Statistics; Magnetic observatory; Solar cycle

Funding

  1. Geophysical Center RAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By digitizing a large collection of K index analog records, Russian and Japanese scientific teams have been able to study the long-term evolution of geomagnetic activity in the northwestern Pacific region from 1954 to 2020. The analysis also reveals a correlation between the distribution features of the K index and sunspot numbers during solar cycles 19-24.
K index is the oldest measure of geomagnetic activity estimation in a unified scale over the globe, maintained until today. Recently, Russian and Japanese scientific teams have managed to digitize a huge collection of K index analog records from the observatories located in the northwestern Pacific region. This has made it possible to study long-term evolution of geomagnetic activity in this area over 1954-2020. Using these unique data, we reveal their most appropriate distribution laws. We also analyze the correlation between their time-varying distribution features and sunspot numbers over the 19-24 solar cycles. The distribution features are considered in terms of (a) quasi-linear regression coefficients derived from logarithmic scale cumulative frequency distributions, and (b) occurrences of different K index values binned by year as a function of time. We establish that the probability of K >= 8 event detected simultaneously at all observatories in the region over the period of simultaneous data availability is less than one hundredth of a percent; the same for the clusters of neighboring observatories is an order of magnitude larger.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available