4.2 Review

Adult Neurogenesis and Gliogenesis: Possible Mechanisms for Neurorestoration

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 103-112

Publisher

KOREAN SOC BRAIN & NEURAL SCIENCE, KOREAN SOC NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE
DOI: 10.5607/en.2016.25.3.103

Keywords

Neurogenesis; gliogenesis; aging; neurodegeneration; neurorestoration

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function (ARC Centre) [CE140100007]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC APP1086643, NHMRC APP1086083]
  3. National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health [1U01MH105971-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The subgranular zone (SGZ) and subventricular zone (SVZ) are developmental remnants of the germinal regions of the brain, hence they retain the ability to generate neuronal progenitor cells in adult life. Neurogenesis in adult brain has an adaptive function because newly produced neurons can integrate into and modify existing neuronal circuits. In contrast to the SGZ and SVZ, other brain regions have a lower capacity to produce new neurons, and this usually occurs via parenchymal and periventricular cell genesis. Compared to neurogenesis, gliogenesis occurs more prevalently in the adult mammalian brain. Under certain circumstances, interaction occurs between neurogenesis and gliogenesis, facilitating glial cells to transform into neuronal lineage. Therefore, modulating the balance between neurogenesis and gliogenesis may present a new perspective for neurorestoration, especially in diseases associated with altered neurogenesis and/or gliogenesis, cell loss, or disturbed homeostasis of cellular constitution. The present review discusses important neuroanatomical features of adult neurogenesis and gliogenesis, aiming to explore how these processes could be modulated toward functional repair of the adult brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available