4.5 Article

Design of Automatic Batch Calibration and Correction System for IMU

Journal

CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 1489-1501

Publisher

TECH SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2022.022091

Keywords

MEMS; inertial measurement unit; batch calibration; automatic calibration

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61803203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an automatic batch calibration method for a set of IMUs, which has been validated through experimental tests and compared with traditional calibration methods, showing improved efficiency and reduced errors.
Thanks to its light weight, low power consumption, and low price, the inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been widely used in civil and military applications such as autopilot, robotics, and tactical weapons. The calibration is an essential procedure before the IMU is put in use, which is generally used to estimate the error parameters such as the bias, installation error, scale factor of the IMU. Currently, the manual one-by-one calibration is still the mostly used manner, which is low in efficiency, time-consuming, and easy to introduce mis-operation. Aiming at this issue, this paper designs an automatic batch calibration method for a set of IMUs. The designed automatic calibration master controller can control the turntable and the data acquisition system at the same time. Each data acquisition front-end can complete data acquisition of eight IMUs one time. And various scenarios of experimental tests have been carried out to validate the proposed design, such as the multi-position tests, the rate tests and swaying tests. The results illustrate the reliability of each function module and the feasibility automatic batch calibration. Compared with the traditional calibration method, the proposed design can reduce errors caused by the manual calibration and greatly improve the efficiency of IMU calibration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available