4.6 Article

Carbon flux through photosynthesis and central carbon metabolism show distinct patterns between algae, C3 and C4 plants

Journal

NATURE PLANTS
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 78-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41477-021-01042-5

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Human Frontiers Science programme
  2. Human Frontiers Science Program [RGP0046/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photosynthesis-related pathways in different algae were investigated using a microfluidics labelling system. The study found distinct flux patterns in some algae supporting faster growth compared to higher plants. Carbon flux through photosynthesis and central carbon metabolism also showed differences between algae, C-3, and C-4 plants.
Photosynthesis-related pathways are regarded as a promising avenue for crop improvement. Whilst empirical studies have shown that photosynthetic efficiency is higher in microalgae than in C-3 or C-4 crops, the underlying reasons remain unclear. Using a tailor-made microfluidics labelling system to supply (CO2)-C-13 at steady state, we investigated in vivo labelling kinetics in intermediates of the Calvin Benson cycle and sugar, starch, organic acid and amino acid synthesis pathways, and in protein and lipids, in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlorella sorokiniana and Chlorella ohadii, which is the fastest growing green alga on record. We estimated flux patterns in these algae and compared them with published and new data from C-3 and C-4 plants. Our analyses identify distinct flux patterns supporting faster growth in photosynthetic cells, with some of the algae exhibiting faster ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate regeneration and increased fluxes through the lower glycolysis and anaplerotic pathways towards the tricarboxylic acid cycle, amino acid synthesis and lipid synthesis than in higher plants. Carbon flux through photosynthesis and central carbon metabolism show distinct patterns between algae, C-3 and C-4 plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available