4.6 Article

NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 99-106

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ONR [N000141712687, N000141912293, N000142012529]
  2. NSF
  3. Hertz Foundation Fellowship
  4. NSF Graduate Fellowship
  5. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [N000142012529, N000141912293] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This method achieves state-of-the-art results for synthesizing novel views of complex scenes by optimizing an underlying continuous volumetric scene function using a sparse set of input views. The algorithm represents a scene using a fully connected deep network and synthesizes views by querying 5D coordinates and using volume rendering techniques.
We present a method that achieves state-of-the-art results for synthesizing novel views of complex scenes by optimizing an underlying continuous volumetric scene function using a sparse set of input views. Our algorithm represents a scene using a fully connected (nonconvolutional) deep network, whose input is a single continuous 5D coordinate (spatial location (x, y, z) and viewing direction (theta, phi)) and whose output is the volume density and view-dependent emitted radiance at that spatial location. We synthesize views by querying 5D coordinates along camera rays and use classic volume rendering techniques to project the output colors and densities into an image. Because volume rendering is naturally differentiable, the only input required to optimize our representation is a set of images with known camera poses. We describe how to effectively optimize neural radiance fields to render photorealistic novel views of scenes with complicated geometry and appearance, and demonstrate results that outperform prior work on neural rendering and view synthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available