4.6 Article

Reward During Arm Training Improves Impairment and Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 140-150

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15459683211062898

Keywords

rehabilitation; stroke; upper extremity; virtual reality; feedback; reward

Funding

  1. Clinical Research Priority Program (CRPP) NeuroRehab of the University of Zurich
  2. P&K Puhringer Foundation
  3. Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI) [13612.1]
  4. ETH Foundation (ETH Research Grant) [ET-17 13-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adding performance feedback and monetary rewards to rehabilitative training can significantly improve arm activity and impairment in stroke patients, indicating a potential facilitating effect of reward on training-mediated improvement of arm paresis.
Background Learning and learning-related neuroplasticity in motor cortex are potential mechanisms mediating recovery of movement abilities after stroke. These mechanisms depend on dopaminergic projections from midbrain that may encode reward information. Likewise, therapist experience confirms the role of feedback/reward for training efficacy after stroke. Objective To test the hypothesis that rehabilitative training can be enhanced by adding performance feedback and monetary rewards. Methods This multicentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial used the ArmeoSenso virtual reality rehabilitation system to train 37 first-ever subacute stroke patients in arm-reaching to moving targets. The rewarded group (n = 19) trained with performance feedback (gameplay) and contingent monetary reward. The control group (n = 18) used the same system without monetary reward and with graphically minimized performance feedback. Primary outcome was the change in the two-dimensional reaching space until the end of the intervention period. Secondary clinical assessments were performed at baseline, after 3 weeks of training (15 1-hour sessions), and at 3 month follow-up. Duration and intensity of the interventions as well as concomitant therapy were comparable between groups. Results The two-dimensional reaching space showed an overall improvement but no difference between groups. The rewarded group, however, showed significantly greater improvements from baseline in secondary outcomes assessing arm activity (Box and Block Test at post-training: 6.03 +/- 2.95, P = .046 and 3 months: 9.66 +/- 3.11, P = .003; Wolf Motor Function Test [Score] at 3 months: .63 +/-.22, P = .007) and arm impairment (Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity at 3 months: 8.22 +/- 3.11, P = .011). Conclusions Although neutral in its primary outcome, the trial signals a potential facilitating effect of reward on training-mediated improvement of arm paresis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available