4.6 Review

Neurorehabilitation in Adults With Traumatic Upper Extremity Amputation: A Scoping Review

Journal

NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 208-216

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15459683211070277

Keywords

limb loss; neuroplasticity; rehabilitation; prostheses; motor function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current literature on upper limb amputation is limited compared to lower limb amputation or prosthetic engineering. Neurobehavioral mechanisms related to motor rehabilitation post-amputation are still not fully understood, emphasizing the need for future research to focus on neural mechanisms and individualized neurorehabilitation parameters.
Background Most of the current literature around amputation focuses on lower extremity amputation or engineering aspects of prosthetic devices. There is a need to more clearly understand neurobehavioral mechanisms related to upper extremity amputation and how such mechanisms might influence recovery and utilization of prostheses. Objective This scoping review aims to identify and summarize the current literature on adult traumatic upper limb amputation in regard to recovery and functional outcomes and how neuroplasticity might influence these findings. Methods We identified appropriate articles using Academic Search Complete EBSCO, OVID Medline, and Cochrane databases. The resulting articles were then exported, screened, and reviewed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Results Eleven (11) studies met the study criteria. Of these studies, 7 focused on sensory involvement, 3 focused on neuroplastic changes post-amputation related to functional impact, and 1 study focused on motor control and learning post-amputation. Overall, these studies revealed an incomplete understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in motor rehabilitation in the central and peripheral nervous systems, while also demonstrating the value of an individualized approach to neurorehabilitation in upper limb loss. Conclusions There is a gap in our understanding of the role of neurorehabilitation following amputation. Overall, focused rehabilitation parameters, demographic information, and clarity around central and peripheral neural mechanisms are needed in future research to address neurobehavioral mechanisms to promote functional recovery following traumatic upper extremity amputation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available