4.5 Article

Estimating COVID-19-induced excess mortality in Lombardy, Italy

Journal

AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 475-479

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40520-021-02060-1

Keywords

COVID-19; Excess mortality; All-cause mortality; Surveillance

Funding

  1. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca [FISR2020IP_00156]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the expected and observed mortality rates in different age groups during the pandemic in Lombardy, Italy. The results show a significant excess mortality in 2020, particularly during the first wave, with approximately 35,000 more deaths than expected. However, in 2021, the excess mortality is not significantly different from zero for certain age groups, and significant reductions in excess mortality are estimated compared to 2020 for other age groups.
We compare the expected all-cause mortality with the observed one for different age classes during the pandemic in Lombardy, which was the epicenter of the epidemic in Italy. The first case in Italy was found in Lombardy in early 2020, and the first wave was mainly centered in Lombardy. The other three waves, in Autumn 2020, March 2021 and Summer 2021 are also characterized by a high number of cases in absolute terms. A generalized linear mixed model is introduced to model weekly mortality from 2011 to 2019, taking into account seasonal patterns and year-specific trends. Based on the 2019 year-specific conditional best linear unbiased predictions, a significant excess of mortality is estimated in 2020, leading to approximately 35000 more deaths than expected, mainly arising during the first wave. In 2021, instead, the excess mortality is not significantly different from zero, for the 85+ and 15-64 age classes, and significant reductions with respect to the 2020 estimated excess mortality are estimated for other age classes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available