4.6 Article

Genetic Influence on Nociceptive Processing in the Human Brain-A Twin Study

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 266-274

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab206

Keywords

pain; nociception; genetics; functional connectivity; fMRI

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [2014-01160, 2018-01322]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2018-01322, 2014-01160] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  3. Vinnova [2014-01160] Funding Source: Vinnova

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic influences have been found in specific brain regions involved in nociceptive processing, such as the midcingulate cortex and posterior insula. Additionally, genetic contributions to large-scale functional connectivity during nociceptive processing have been identified.
Nociceptive processing in the human brain is complex and involves several brain structures and varies across individuals. Determining the structures that contribute to interindividual differences in nociceptive processing is likely to improve our understanding of why some individuals feel more pain than others. Here, we found specific parts of the cerebral response to nociception that are under genetic influence by employing a classic twin-design. We found genetic influences on nociceptive processing in the midcingulate cortex and bilateral posterior insula. In addition to brain activations, we found genetic contributions to large-scale functional connectivity (FC) during nociceptive processing. We conclude that additive genetics influence specific brain regions involved in nociceptive processing. The genetic influence on FC during nociceptive processing is not limited to core nociceptive brain regions, such as the dorsal posterior insula and somatosensory areas, but also involves cognitive and affective brain circuitry. These findings improve our understanding of human pain perception and increases chances to find new treatments for clinical pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available