4.7 Article

CO2 outgassing during collisional orogeny is facilitated by the generation of immiscible fluids

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-022-00340-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research (PRIN) [2017LMNLAW]
  2. MUR project Dipartimenti di Eccelllenza

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The outgassing of CO2 during collisional orogeny can be explained by the generation of CO2-rich fluids and hydrosaline brines. Thermodynamic modeling shows that these fluids have different properties and mobility through the crust, and can contribute to carbon mobilization.
Outgassing of CO2 during collisional orogeny can be explained by the generation of immiscible CO2-rich fluids and hydrosaline brines in metamorphosed sediments, according to thermodynamic modelling applied to the Himalaya. Orogenic degassing is emerging as a potentially relevant source of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the continental crust. However, the processes of carbon mobilization are still poorly explored. Here, we use thermodynamic modeling to investigate the decarbonation of sediments metamorphosed under high geothermal gradients. Our modeling shows that immiscible CO2-rich vapors and hydrosaline brines are generated at these conditions, with different properties and mobility through the crust. The CO2-rich fluid fraction could rapidly rise toward the surface without interacting with the host rocks by carbo-fracturing the host rocks or through deep faults. The denser hydrosaline brines likely permeate the source rocks. When applied to the active Himalayan orogen, these observations reconcile measured CO2 fluxes at the surface and positive conductivity anomalies associated with micro-seismicity at depth. Our modeling shows that the continental crust represents a relevant reservoir of CO2 that can be efficiently degassed during hot collisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available