4.6 Article

Kidney function, brain morphology and cognition in the elderly: sex differences in the Austrian Stroke Prevention Study

Journal

AGING-US
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 240-252

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC

Keywords

kidney function; brain morphology; sex; aging

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund [P20545, P13180, KLI523, P30134, I2889-B31]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P30134] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Impaired kidney function is associated with brain volume loss and cognitive dysfunction, particularly in men.
Impaired kidney function is associated with structural brain changes and cognitive dysfunction. In the aging kidney, hemodynamic and structural alterations reduce the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Little is known about differences between men and women regarding decline of kidney function and brain damage. In this community-based study, we assessed associations between the eGFR, focal and diffuse brain abnormalities and cognitive functions. Sex-specific effects were analyzed by interaction terms eGFR x sex on brain structure and cognition. Interactive effects were assessed using mixed-models -stratified by sex. Overall, 196 women and 129 men (median age 68 years and mean eGFR 73.8 +/- 14.9 ml/min/1.73m(2)) were included. Significant associations existed between eGFR and cortical volume (beta: 1.53E-04; SE: 6.72E-05; p=0.023 for neocortex). Sex exerted a significant interactive effect. Only in men, eGFR related to cortical volumes of all lobes and of deep gray matter structures (p= 0.001 for total gray matter, p=0.0004 for neocortex). In the whole group eGFR was not associated with cognition, but men with lower eGFR performed worse on tests for executive function, which, after FDR correction, was not significant. We conclude, that in community-dwelling middle-aged and elderly individuals, reduced eGFR relates to brain volume loss in men but not in women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available