4.6 Article

Axonal plasticity underpins the functional recovery following surgical decompression in a rat model of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Journal

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40478-016-0359-7

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Qatar Foundation
  2. NIHR Clinician Scientist Award
  3. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons' Reg Worcester Research Fellowship
  4. Neurosurgical Society of Australasia Research Scholarship
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. MRC
  7. National Institute for Health Research [CS-2015-15-023]
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_12009] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. National Institute for Health Research [CS-2015-15-023] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common spinal cord disorder and a major cause of disability in adults. Improvements following surgical decompression are limited and patients often remain severely disabled. Post mortem studies indicate that CSM is associated with profound axonal loss. However, our understanding of the pathophysiology of CSM remains limited. To investigate the hypothesis that axonal plasticity plays a role in the recovery following surgical decompression, we adopted a novel preclinical model of mild to moderate CSM. Spinal cord compression resulted in significant locomotor deterioration, increased expression of the axonal injury marker APP, and loss of serotonergic fibres. Surgical decompression partially reversed the deficits and attenuated APP expression. Decompression was also associated with axonal sprouting, reflected in the restoration of serotonergic fibres and an increase of GAP43 expression. The re-expression of synaptophysin indicated the restoration of functional synapses following decompression. Promoting axonal plasticity may therefore be a therapeutic strategy for promoting neurological recovery in CSM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available