4.5 Article

Association of Built Environmental Features with Rates of Infectious Diseases in Remote Indigenous Communities in the Northern Territory, Australia

Journal

HEALTHCARE
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10010173

Keywords

built environment; indigenous; communicable diseases; infectious diseases; disease outbreaks; community infrastructure; remote community; spatial epidemiology; public health

Funding

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [GNT1051824]
  3. University of South Australia School of Health Sciences Conference Scholarship
  4. Konrad Jamrozik Student Scholarship, Public Health Association of Australia-South Australia Branch
  5. SA State Population Health Student Scholarship, Australian Health Promotion Association-South Australia Branch

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The health of Indigenous Australians, especially in terms of infectious diseases, is worse compared to non-Indigenous Australians. This study aimed to explore the associations between built environmental features and infectious disease incidence rates in remote Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory, Australia. The results showed that infrastructure shelter and communal design features were significantly associated with elevated disease outcomes.
The health of Indigenous Australians is far poorer than non-Indigenous Australians, including an excess burden of infectious diseases. The health effect of built environmental (BE) features on Indigenous communities receives little attention. This study's objective was to determine associations between BE features and infectious disease incidence rates in remote Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia. Remote Indigenous communities (n = 110) were spatially joined to 93 Indigenous Locations (ILOC). Outcomes data were extracted (NT Notifiable Diseases System) and expressed as ILOC-specific incidence rates. Counts of buildings were extracted from community asset maps and grouped by function. Age-adjusted infectious disease rates were dichotomised, and bivariate binomial regression used to determine the relationships between BE variables and infectious disease. Infrastructure Shelter BE features were universally associated with significantly elevated disease outcomes (relative risk 1.67 to 2.03). Significant associations were observed for Services, Arena, Community, Childcare, Oval, and Sports and recreation BE features. BE groupings associated with disease outcomes were those with communal and/or social design intent or use. Comparable BE groupings without this intent or use did not associate with disease outcomes. While discouraging use of communal BE features during infectious disease outbreaks is a conceptually valid countermeasure, communal activities have additional health benefits themselves, and infectious disease transmission could instead be reduced through repairs to infrastructure, and more infrastructure. This is the first study to examine these associations simultaneously in more than a handful of remote Indigenous communities to illustrate community-level rather than aggregated population-level associations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available