4.5 Article

Alternating Attention and Physical Fitness in Relation to the Level of Combat Training

Journal

HEALTHCARE
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10020241

Keywords

physical fitness; alternating attention; combat training; cadets

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The level of combat training of future commanders is crucial for national defense. This study found that the practical military performance of cadets is closely related to their strength and endurance levels, while physical fitness does not significantly affect shooting accuracy. The level of alternating attention was identified as a key determinant of shooting accuracy.
The level of combat training (CT) of the future commander-leader is of critical importance to the armed forces in national defense. This study aimed to search for the relationship between the level of alternating attention, physical fitness and shooting accuracy (SA), and academic achievements in practical military subjects (PMS). The study group consisted of 137 cadets of the Military University of Land Forces. The measure of alternating attention in the study was the Color Trails Test results. Motor components were assessed by measuring hand static strength, endurance run, and time of a speed and agility run. SA and PMS were taken as measures of cadets' CT. Significantly higher PMS were associated with higher levels of strength and better endurance in cadets. The physical fitness of the cadets did not significantly affect the cadets' SA. The main result of the study is the revelation of the level of alternating attention as a strong determinant of cadets' SA. The authors suggest that the main emphasis should be put on the physical preparation of a modern soldier, focused on the development of strength and endurance skills. It is also reasonable to introduce cognitive stimulation exercises to shooting training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available