3.8 Proceedings Paper

Thermodynamic analysis of thermochemical energy storage system based on AB5 type hydride pairs

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 2042-2047

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.221

Keywords

Thermochemical energy storage; Metal hydride; Pressure concentration isotherm (PCI); Energy storage density and second law efficiency

Funding

  1. Department of Science & Technology, Government of India [DST/TMD/MES/2k16/50]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study focused on analyzing the performance of a thermochemical energy storage system using four different working pairs. The first law and second law performance parameters were used to evaluate the system's performance. The results showed that the working pairs had different temperature ranges for heat storage and heat recovery, and exhibited variations in heat upgradation and energy storage density.
The present study deals with the performance analysis of thermochemical energy storage system based on four different working pairs, namely LaNi4.85Sn0.15-MmNi(4.6)Al(0.4), LaNi4.75Sn0.25-MmNi(4.6)Al(0.4), LaNi4.65Sn0.35-MmNi(4.6)Al(0.4) and LaNi4.55Sn0.45-MmNi(4.6)Al(0.4). The first law and second law performance parameters are considered to evaluate the performance of the energy storage system. The temperature of heat storage and heat recovery for the four different working pairs are in the range of 93-140 degrees C and 105-165 degrees C respectively. Recovering the heat at higher temperature than that of storage is called heat upgradation. Highest degree of heat upgradation is 24 degrees C, and it is obtained for the working pair of LaNi4.55Sn0.45-MmNi(4.6)Al(0.4). The theoretical highest energy storage density and COP are 129 kJ/kg and 0.54 respectively for the working pair of LaNi4.65Sn0.35-MmNi(4.6)Al(0.4). From the second analysis, the lowest exergy loss and highest second law efficiency are 2.57 kJ and 96.4% respectively for the working pair of LaNi4.75Sn0.25-MmNi(4.6)Al(0.4). Based on the first law analysis, the working pair, LaNi4.65Sn0.35-MmNi(4.6)Al(0.4), is taken as best pair and based on the second law analysis, the working pair, LaNi4.75Sn0.25-MmNi(4.6)Al(0.4), is taken as best pair. However, suitable working pair need to be selected based on the type of application. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the Global Conference on Recent Advances in Sustainable Materials 2021.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available