4.7 Article

The application of coal liquefaction residue raffinate slag-based sorbents for elemental mercury removal from coal-fired flue gas

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.107045

Keywords

Industrial waste; Raffinate slag; Sulfur-containing carbon-based sorbents; Hg-0 capture; Coal-fired flue gas

Funding

  1. Fundation of CHN ENERGY 2030 Project [GJNY2030XDXM-19-17]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1710107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated that sorbents prepared from industrial waste CLR-RS showed excellent Hg-0 removal performance under N-2 + O-2 and N-2 + O-2 + SO2 + NO + H2O conditions, suggesting their potential application for industrial Hg-0 capture. Sustainable utilization could be achieved through recycling RS.
Capture of elemental mercury (Hg-0) attracts global attention because of its toxicity and bioaccumulation. Carbon-based sorbents are extensively studied due to the high porosity that can increase Hg-0 adsorption ability. In this study, the RS-based sorbents were prepared from sulfur-containing coal liquefaction residue raffinate slag (CLR-RS), an industrial waste, by CH3COOK activation. The N-2 adsorption, XRD, SEM, XRF, Hg-TPD, and XPS techniques were used to study the physicochemical properties of sorbents. The sorbent that was prepared at 850 degrees C from the blend of CH3COOK/RS at 3:5 (by mass) exhibited excellent Hg-0 removal performance under N-2 + O-2, and an improved performance was observed under N-2 + O-2 + SO2 + NO + H2O. The Hg-TPD and XPS analyses revealed that HgS and HgO were formed on used RS-based sorbents. O-2 in flue gas could improve the ability in capturing Hg-0 by promoting the formation of HgS and HgO. The findings have suggested that the prepared sorbents based on CLR-RS could be potentially applied for industrial Hg-0 capture, and the sustainable utilization could be realized by recycling RS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available