4.7 Article

Climate Change and Aedes Vectors: 21st Century Projections for Dengue Transmission in Europe

Journal

EBIOMEDICINE
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 267-277

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.03.046

Keywords

Dengue; Vectorial capacity; Aedes aegypti; Aeries albopictus; Temperature; Climate change

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Warming temperatures may increase the geographic spread of vector-bome diseases into temperate areas. Although a tropical mosquito-borne viral disease, a dengue outbreak occurred in Madeira, Portugal, in 2012; the first in Europe since 1920s. This outbreak emphasizes the potential for dengue re-emergence in Europe given changing climates. We present estimates of dengue epidemic potential using vectorial capacity (VC) based on historic and projected temperature (1901-2099). VC indicates the vectors ability to spread disease among humans. We calculated temperature-dependent VC for Europe, highlighting 10 European cities and three non-European reference cities. Compared with the tropics, Europe shows pronounced seasonality and geographical heterogeneity. Although low, VC during summer is currently sufficient for dengue outbreaks in Southern Europe to commence-if sufficient vector populations (either Ae. aegypti and Ae albopictus) were active and virus were introduced. Under various climate change scenarios, the seasonal peak and time window for dengue epidemic potential increases during the 21st century. Our study maps dengue epidemic potential in Europe and identifies seasonal time windows when major cities are most conducive for dengue transmission from 1901 to 2099. Our findings illustrate, that besides vector control, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions crucially reduces the future epidemic potential of dengue in Europe. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by ElsevierB.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (hiip://c-reaiivecommons.org/licenses,/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available