4.7 Article

Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using different plant extracts and their antibacterial activity

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107130

Keywords

Copper nanoparticles bactericidal activity; CuNPs green synthesis; CuNPs lineal defects; CuNPs with and Rosa 'Andeli'double delight; CuNPs with Gardenia jasminoides

Funding

  1. Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico, Mexico [5084.19-P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Green chemistry was utilized to synthesize copper nanoparticles, using aqueous extract from different plants as stabilizing agents, which showed differences on the particle size, dispersity, and antibacterial activity. The nanoparticles synthesized with Rosa 'Andeli' double delight fresh petals extract exhibited higher antibacterial activity compared to those synthesized with Gardenia jasminoides Ellis fresh leaves extract.
Green chemistry was used to synthesize copper nanoparticles (CuNPs), using an aqueous extract of Rosa 'Andeli' double delight fresh petals (RAFE) or Gardenia jasminoides Ellis fresh leaves (GJLE), as stabilizing agents. The effect of the RAFE and GJLE on the CuNPs morphology, size, polydispersity, density of dislocations (delta), and their antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli was determined. The green synthesized CuNPs have a spherical morphology, with an FCC (face-centered cubic) structure and a d-spacing of 0.2089 nm. The size, dispersity, density of dislocations, and microstrain are found to be dependent, on the type of the aqueous extract employed as stabilizing agents. The CuNPs synthesized with RAFE (CuNPs/RAFE) have a mode size of 11.7 nm and higher polydispersity than the synthesized with GJLE (CuNPs/GJLE), which results in 3 nm size and monodispersed. The CuNPs/RAFE showed higher antibacterial activity against both bacteria, with a 0% survival percentage at 100 mu g/mL (S. aureus), and 10% of survival percentage at 125 mu g/mL (E. coli).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available