3.8 Article

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ROBOTS AND UNEMPLOYMENT: EVIDENCE FROM OECD COUNTRIES

Journal

JOURNAL OF INNOVATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT
Volume -, Issue 37, Pages 117-138

Publisher

DE BOECK UNIV
DOI: 10.3917/jie.037.0117

Keywords

Technological Unemployment; Skill-biased Technical Change; Labor Market Polarization; Robots; Artificial Intelligence; Robotics; Okun's Law

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that an increase in the stock of industrial robots is positively correlated with the unemployment rate, and there is also a positive correlation between artificial intelligence and the unemployment rate, although weaker compared to robots. The effects of robots and AI on unemployment rates vary significantly among different education and age groups, with robots having a stronger impact on people with a medium level of education.
Investigating the relation between artificial intelligence, robots and unemployment on a panel of 33 OECD countries covering the 2005-2017 period, we find that a 10% increase in the stock of industrial robots is associated with a 0.42 point increase in the unemployment rate. For artificial intelligence (AI), we use patents as a proxy of AI-related technological capabilities and find a positive correlation with the aggregated unemployment rate, albeit statistically weaker than the one found for robots. We then run the regressions on unemployment rates differentiated by education and age, and observe highly heterogeneous effects between groups. For example, the effect of robots is 2.5 times greater for 25.34 year-olds below upper secondary education levels than for the 55.64 year-olds with a tertiary degree. Lastly, the effect of robots is strongest on the unemployment rate of people with a medium level of education, providing some evidence that robots could contribute to the polarization of the labor market. A similar effect is found with AI, but the results are less robust than for robots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available