4.5 Article

International Overview of Somatic Dysfunction Assessment and Treatment in Osteopathic Research: A Scoping Review

Journal

HEALTHCARE
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10010028

Keywords

osteopathic manipulative treatment; somatic dysfunction; manual therapy; osteopathic techniques

Funding

  1. Centre pour l'Etude, la Recherche et laDiffusionOsteopathiques C.E.R.D.O., Rome, Italy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This scoping review explores the importance of treating somatic dysfunctions (SD) in osteopathic practice, emphasizing the clinical value of SD in assessment and decision-making processes. More studies are needed to understand the selection of assessment and intervention modalities and to evaluate new osteopathic models.
Background: Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a patient-centred, whole-body intervention aimed at enhance the person's self-regulation. OMT interventions are focused on somatic dysfunctions (SD) that can be defined as an altered regulative function associated with inflammatory signs palpable in the body framework in different body regions. The conceptual model that sustains SD, as well as its usefulness for the osteopathic profession, is still being discussed by the osteopathic community. Understanding the role and the application of SD is the aim of this scoping review. Methods: A literature search was carried out through the main biomedical databases: Pubmed (Medline), Cochrane, Central (Cochrane), Embase, PEDro and Scopus. Grey literature was considered via Google Scholar and the Osteopathic Research Web. The review was prepared by referring to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Results: A total of 37,279 records were identified through database searching and other sources. After the duplicates were removed, 27,023 titles and abstracts were screened. A total of 1495 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. The qualitative synthesis included 280 studies. Conclusions: Treating SD is an important part of osteopathic practice that varies from country to country. SD should be considered as a clinical value that assists in the clinical assessment and guides the decision-making process of osteopathic practitioners. Further studies should be designed to better understand why and how to choose the different assessment and intervention modalities to approach SD and to evaluate new osteopathic models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available