4.7 Article

Dynamic and Fault-Tolerant Clustering for Scientific Workflows

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CLOUD COMPUTING
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 49-62

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCC.2015.2427200

Keywords

Scientific workflows; fault tolerance; parameter estimation; failure; machine learning; task clustering; job grouping

Funding

  1. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  2. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) [1148515] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Task clustering has proven to be an effective method to reduce execution overhead and to improve the computational granularity of scientific workflow tasks executing on distributed resources. However, a job composed of multiple tasks may have a higher risk of suffering from failures than a single task job. In this paper, we conduct a theoretical analysis of the impact of transient failures on the runtime performance of scientific workflow executions. We propose a general task failure modeling framework that uses a maximum likelihood estimation-based parameter estimation process to model workflow performance. We further propose three fault-tolerant clustering strategies to improve the runtime performance of workflow executions in faulty execution environments. Experimental results show that failures can have significant impact on executions where task clustering policies are not fault-tolerant, and that our solutions yield makespan improvements in such scenarios. In addition, we propose a dynamic task clustering strategy to optimize the workflow's makespan by dynamically adjusting the clustering granularity when failures arise. A trace-based simulation of five real workflows shows that our dynamic method is able to adapt to unexpected behaviors, and yields better makespans when compared to static methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available