3.8 Proceedings Paper

Honey based hydrogel as delivery system for wound healing

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 1709-1718

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.488

Keywords

Hydrogels; Honey; Carbopol-940; Chitosan; Nano silver water

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study aimed to develop a hydrogel-based drug delivery system with wound healing potential. Honey-based hydrogels were prepared using a cold mechanical method and characterized for various properties. The results showed that the prepared hydrogels were acceptable and demonstrated promising wound healing effects.
The present study was intended for development of hydrogel-based drug delivery system with wound healing potential. The honey-based hydrogels were prepared by cold mechanical method. Carbopol940 and Chitosan (75% deacetylated) were used as polymers. Triethanolamine was used as a pH adjuster. Methyl paraben was used as preservative and propylene glycol as an emollient. The developed hydrogels were characterized for pH, viscosity, swelling index, spreadability, drug content, in-vitro permeation studies using dialysis membrane and in-vivo wound healing activity by excision wound model. The results indicated the acceptability of the prepared hydrogels by the evaluation tests. The in-vitro permeation studies showed that release of honey varied according to the percentage of honey and the polymer used in the hydrogels. Formulation F14 was found to be the best formulation with cumulative percent drug release of 90.75% and showed greater rate of wound healing within 12 days. Hence, the results of this research work showed that the developed hydrogels can provide a better delivery system for wound healing. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the Global Conference on Recent Advances in Sustainable Materials 2021.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available