4.5 Review

Repurposing the drug, ivermectin, in COVID-19: toxicological points of view

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00645-8

Keywords

Ivermectin; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus disease 2019

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The global COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes in behavior and the evaluation of potential therapies, including ivermectin. While ivermectin appears to be safe with minimum side effects, there are still serious questions about its effectiveness in treating patients with COVID-19.
The global COVID-19 pandemic has affected the world's population by causing changes in behavior, such as social distancing, masking, restricting people's movement, and evaluating existing medication as potential therapies. Many pre-existing medications such as tocilizumab, ivermectin, colchicine, interferon, and steroids have been evaluated for being repurposed to use for the treatment of COVID-19. None of these agents have been effective except for steroids and, to a lesser degree, tocilizumab. Ivermectin has been one of the suggested repurposed medications which exhibit an in vitro inhibitory activity on SARS-CoV-2 replication. The most recommended dose of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 is 150-200 mu g/kg twice daily. As ivermectin adoption for COVID-19 increased, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning on its use during the pandemic. However, the drug remains of interest to clinicians and has shown some promise in observational studies. This narrative reviews the toxicological profile and some potential therapeutic effects of ivermectin. Based on the current dose recommendation, ivermectin appears to be safe with minimum side effects. However, serious questions remain about the effectiveness of this drug in the treatment of patients with COVID-19.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available