4.6 Article

Thermalization of locally perturbed many-body quantum systems

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.024310

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [FOR 2692, 355031190, 397300368]
  2. Paderborn Center for Parallel Computing (PC2) within the Project HPC-PRF-UBI2
  3. International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS) [ICTS/hydrodynamics2019/11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Finding conditions for thermalization in macroscopic systems from the underlying quantum dynamics of their microscopic constituents remains a challenge in theoretical physics. This study demonstrates analytically that systems satisfying the weak eigenstate thermalization hypothesis exhibit thermalization for two specific far-from-equilibrium initial conditions, providing insights into the problem of thermalization.
Deriving conditions under which a macroscopic system thermalizes directly from the underlying quantum many-body dynamics of its microscopic constituents is a long-standing challenge in theoretical physics. The well-known eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) is presumed to be a key mechanism, but has defied rigorous verification for generic systems thus far. A weaker variant (weak ETH), by contrast, is provably true for a large variety of systems, including even many integrable models, but its implications with respect to the problem of thermalization are still largely unexplored. Here we analytically demonstrate that systems satisfying the weak ETH exhibit thermalization for two very natural classes of far-from-equilibrium initial conditions: the overwhelming majority of all pure states with a preset nonequilibrium expectation value of some given local observable, and the Gibbs states of a Hamiltonian which subsequently is subject to a quantum quench in the form of a sudden change of some local system properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available