4.6 Article

Oral Anticoagulant Therapy Prescription in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Across the Spectrum of Stroke Risk Insights From the NCDR PINNACLE Registry

Journal

JAMA CARDIOLOGY
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 55-62

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0374

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IMPORTANCE Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at a proportionally higher risk of stroke based on accumulation of well-defined risk factors. OBJECTIVE To examine the extent to which prescription of an oral anticoagulant (OAC) in US cardiology practices increases as the number of stroke risk factors increases. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional registry study of outpatients with AF enrolled in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry's PINNACLE (Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence) Registry between January 1, 2008, and December 30, 2012. As a measure of stroke risk, we calculated the CHADS(2) score and the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score for all patients. Using multinomial logistic regression models adjusted for patient, physician, and practice characteristics, we examined the association between increased stroke risk score and prescription of an OAC. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was prescription of an OAC with warfarin sodium or a non-vitamin K antagonist OAC. RESULTS The study cohort comprised 429 417 outpatients with AF. Their mean (SD) age was 71.3 (12.9) years, and 55.8% were male. Prescribed treatment consisted of an OAC (192 600 [44.9%]), aspirin only (111 134 [25.9%]), aspirin plus a thienopyridine (23 454 [5.5%]), or no antithrombotic therapy (102 229 [23.8%]). Each 1-point increase in risk score was associated with increased odds of OAC prescription compared with aspirin-only prescription using the CHADS(2) score (adjusted odds ratio, 1.158; 95% CI, 1.144-1.172; P <.001) and the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score (adjusted odds ratio, 1.163; 95% CI, 1.157-1.169; P <.001). Overall, OAC prescription prevalence did not exceed 50% even in higher-risk patients with a CHADS(2) score exceeding 3 or a CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score exceeding 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In a large quality improvement registry of outpatients with AF, prescription of OAC therapy increased with a higher CHADS2 score and CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score. However, a plateau of OAC prescription was observed, with less than half of high-risk patients receiving an OAC prescription.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available