4.8 Article

The thermodynamic scale of inorganic crystalline metastability

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 2, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1600225

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy (DOE) Basic Energy Sciences program [DE-AC02-05CH11231, EDCBEE]
  2. U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences as part of the DOE Energy Frontier Research Center Center for Next Generation of Materials by Design: Incorporating Metastability [UGA-0-41029-16/ER392000]
  3. U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. U.S. DOE Office of Science Facility at Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC0012704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The space of metastable materials offers promising new design opportunities for next-generation technological materials such as complex oxides, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, steels, and beyond. Although metastable phases are ubiquitous in both nature and technology, only a heuristic understanding of their underlying thermodynamics exists. We report a large-scale data-mining study of the Materials Project, a high-throughput database of density functional theory-calculated energetics of Inorganic Crystal Structure Database structures, to explicitly quantify the thermodynamic scale of metastability for 29,902 observed inorganic crystalline phases. We reveal the influence of chemistry and composition on the accessible thermodynamic range of crystalline metastability for polymorphic and phase-separating compounds, yielding new physical insights that can guide the design of novel metastable materials. We further assert that not all low-energy metastable compounds can necessarily be synthesized, and propose a principle of 'remnant metastability'-that observable metastable crystalline phases are generally remnants of thermodynamic conditions where they were once the lowest free-energy phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available