4.7 Article

Breaking the single clock symmetry: Measuring single-field inflation non-Gaussian features

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.043503

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ASI Grant [2016-24-H.0]
  2. FEDER Una manera de hacer Europa
  3. Center of Excellence Maria de Maeztu 2020-2023 award [CEX2019-000918-M, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]
  4. European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program ERC (BePreSySe) [725327]
  5. [PGC2018-098866-B-I00 MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explains the impact of the components in the universe beyond cold dark matter and dark energy on the single-clock assumption from inflation. It quantifies this effect and shows that the single-clock symmetry is not satisfied in interpreting state-of-the-art surveys. The breaking of this symmetry is crucial for studying non-Gaussian features.
The Universe is not just cold dark matter and dark energy, it also contains baryons, radiation and neutrinos. The presence of these components, beyond the pressureless cold dark matter and the quasiuniform dark energy ones, imply that the single clock assumption from inflation is no longer preserved. Here we quantify this effect and show that the single-clock symmetry is ensured only on scales where baryonic effects, neutrinos effects, or sound speed are zero. These scales depend on the cosmic epoch and the Universe composition. Hence for all use and purposes of interpreting state-of-the-art and possibly forthcoming surveys, in the accessible scales, single clock symmetry cannot be said to be satisfied. Breaking the single-clock symmetry has key consequences for the study of non-Gaussian features generated by pure single-field inflation which arise from nonlinearities in the metric yielding non-Gaussianities of the local type: the n(s) - 1 and the relativistic -5/3 term.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available