Journal
SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages -Publisher
AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500983
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [PBBSP3-135985, PA00P3-145375/1]
- NSF [DBI-1262545]
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [AN549/3-1]
- Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PBBSP3-135985, PA00P3_145375] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
- Direct For Biological Sciences
- Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1262402, 1262545] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Since Darwin's conception of sexual selection theory, scientists have struggled to identify the evolutionary forces underlying the pervasive differences between male and female behavior, morphology, and physiology. The Darwin-Bateman paradigm predicts that anisogamy imposes stronger sexual selection on males, which, in turn, drives the evolution of conventional sex roles in terms of female-biased parental care and male-biased sexual dimorphism. Although this paradigm forms the cornerstone of modern sexual selection theory, it still remains untested across the animal tree of life. This lack of evidence has promoted the rise of alternative hypotheses arguing that sex differences are entirely driven by environmental factors or chance. We demonstrate that, across the animal kingdom, sexual selection, as captured by standard Bateman metrics, is indeed stronger in males than in females and that it is evolutionarily tied to sex biases in parental care and sexual dimorphism. Our findings provide the first comprehensive evidence that Darwin's concept of conventional sex roles is accurate and refute recent criticism of sexual selection theory.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available