4.8 Article

Experimental test of nonlocal causality

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1600162

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems [CE110001013]
  2. Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology [CE110001027]
  3. Templeton World Charity Foundation [TWCF 0064/AB38]
  4. Excellence Initiative of the German Federal and State Governments [ZUK 43, ZUK 81]
  5. U.S. Army Research Office [W911NF-14-1-0098, W911NF-14-1-0133]
  6. DFG [GRO 4334, SPP 1798]
  7. Brazilian ministry MEC
  8. Brazilian ministry MCTIC
  9. University of Queensland Vice-Chancellor's Senior Research and Teaching Fellowship
  10. Australian Research Council [DE130100240]
  11. Australian Research Council [DE130100240] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Explaining observations in terms of causes and effects is central to empirical science. However, correlations between entangled quantum particles seem to defy such an explanation. This implies that some of the fundamental assumptions of causal explanations have to give way. We consider a relaxation of one of these assumptions, Bell's local causality, by allowing outcome dependence: a direct causal influence between the outcomes of measurements of remote parties. We use interventional data from a photonic experiment to bound the strength of this causal influence in a two-party Bell scenario, and observational data from a Bell-type inequality test for the considered models. Our results demonstrate the incompatibility of quantum mechanics with a broad class of nonlocal causal models, which includes Bell-local models as a special case. Recovering a classical causal picture of quantum correlations thus requires an even more radical modification of our classical notion of cause and effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available