4.7 Review

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to modeling uncertainty

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023515

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0007901]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation
  3. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  4. Scienceand Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  5. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  6. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  7. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  8. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  9. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  10. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  11. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  12. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  13. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  14. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  15. Argonne National Laboratory
  16. University of California at Santa Cruz
  17. University of Cambridge
  18. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  19. University of Chicago
  20. University College London
  21. DES-Brazil Consortium
  22. University of Edinburgh
  23. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich
  24. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  25. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  26. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  27. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  28. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  29. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat Munchen
  30. University of Michigan
  31. National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  32. University of Nottingham
  33. Ohio State University
  34. University of Pennsylvania
  35. University of Portsmouth
  36. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University
  37. University of Sussex
  38. Texas AM University
  39. OzDES Membership Consortium
  40. National Science Foundation [AST-1138766, AST-1536171]
  41. MINECO [AYA2015-71825, ESP2015-88861, FPA2015-68048, SEV-2012-0234, SEV-2016-0597, MDM-2015-0509]
  42. ERDF funds from the European Union
  43. CERCA program of the Generalitat de Catalunya
  44. European Research Council under the European Union
  45. ERC [240672, 291329, 306478]
  46. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) [CE110001020]
  47. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from the Darki Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data, using over 100 million source galaxies. The lensing amplitude parameter S-8 is constrained at the 3% level in the ΛCDM model, and the robustness of the results to modeling of intrinsic alignments is explored. Constraints from other weak lensing experiments and the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) are compared, and the statistical preference for different complexity intrinsic alignment models is examined.
This work and its companion paper, Amon et al. [Phys. Rev. D 105, 023514 (2022)], present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Darki Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter S-8 equivalent to sigma(8)root Omega(m)/0.3 at the 3% level in Lambda CDM: S-8 = 0.759(-0.023)(+0.025) (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angular scale cuts that are optimized for the Lambda CDM analysis: S-8 = 0.772(-0.017)(+0.018) (68% CL). With cosmic shear alone, we find no statistically significant constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at our present statistical power. We carry out our analysis blind, and compare our measurement with constraints from two other contemporary weak lensing experiments: the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) and Hyper-Suprime Camera Subaru Strategic Program (HSC). We additionally quantify the agreement between our data and external constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). Our DES Y3 result under the assumption of ACDM is found to be in statistical agreement with Planck 2018, although favors a lower S-8 than the CMB-inferred value by 2.3 sigma (a p -value of 0.02). This paper explores the robustness of these cosmic shear results to modeling of intrinsic alignments, the matter power spectrum and baryonic physics. We additionally explore the statistical preference of our data for intrinsic alignment models of different complexity. The fiducial cosmic shear model is tested using synthetic data, and we report no biases greater than 0.3 sigma in the plane of S-8 x Omega(m) caused by uncertainties in the theoretical models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available