4.5 Article

SHIP-MR and Radiology: 12 Years of Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Single Center

Journal

HEALTHCARE
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10010033

Keywords

population-based imaging; longitudinal cohort study; whole-body magnetic resonance imaging; phenotyping; radiomics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Study of Health in Pomerania conducted a population-based study using whole-body MR imaging in a rural area. Through analyzing the imaging sequences used and their citation frequency, fruitful sequences and focused body parts were identified. The study suggests that more precise goals should be defined when allocating imaging time and proposes recording the number and impact of published work for quality control.
The Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP), a population-based study from a rural state in northeastern Germany with a relatively poor life expectancy, supplemented its comprehensive examination program in 2008 with whole-body MR imaging at 1.5 T (SHIP-MR). We reviewed more than 100 publications that used the SHIP-MR data and analyzed which sequences already produced fruitful scientific outputs and which manuscripts have been referenced frequently. Upon reviewing the publications about imaging sequences, those that used T1-weighted structured imaging of the brain and a gradient-echo sequence for R2* mapping obtained the highest scientific output; regarding specific body parts examined, most scientific publications focused on MR sequences involving the brain and the (upper) abdomen. We conclude that population-based MR imaging in cohort studies should define more precise goals when allocating imaging time. In addition, quality control measures might include recording the number and impact of published work, preferably on a bi-annual basis and starting 2 years after initiation of the study. Structured teaching courses may enhance the desired output in areas that appear underrepresented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available