4.8 Review

Direct air capture: process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 1360-1405

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ee03523a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie-Skodowska-Curie grant [754382]
  2. Community of Madrid [M-2177-DESMAT]
  3. Rey Juan Carlos University [M-2177-DESMAT]
  4. Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/P026214/1]
  5. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/P019900/1]
  6. Royal Academy of Engineering
  7. EPSRC [EP/V047078/1]
  8. UK Catalysis Hub - EPSRC [EP/R027129/1]
  9. EPSRC [EP/R027129/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the latest developments in direct air capture (DAC) technology and proposes research challenges in process technology, techno-economic, and socio-political domains.
Climate change mitigation scenarios that meet the Paris Agreement's objective of limiting global warming usually assume an important role for carbon dioxide removal and negative emissions technologies. Direct air capture (DAC) is a carbon dioxide removal technology which separates CO2 directly from the air using an engineered system. DAC can therefore be used alongside other negative emissions technologies, in principle, to mitigate CO2 emissions from a wide variety of sources, including those that are mobile and dispersed. The ultimate fate of the CO2, whether it is stored, reused, or utilised, along with choices related to the energy and materials inputs for a DAC process, dictates whether or not the overall process results in negative emissions. In recent years, DAC has undergone significant technical development, with commercial entities now operating in the market and prospects for significant upscale. Here we review the state-of-the-art to provide clear research challenges across the process technology, techno-economic and socio-political domains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available