4.3 Article

Implicit Large Eddy Simulations of a rectangular 5:1 cylinder with a high-order discontinuous Galerkin method

Journal

WIND AND STRUCTURES
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 59-72

Publisher

TECHNO-PRESS
DOI: 10.12989/was.2022.34.1.059

Keywords

BARC benchmark; discontinuous Galerkin method; Implicit Large Eddy Simulation; (ILES); implicit time integration

Funding

  1. CINECA award under the ISCRA initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the numerical results of the flow around a 5:1 rectangular cylinder under different conditions. The simulations demonstrate the accuracy of the results by comparing with experimental data and other simulation results. Additionally, various factors affecting the accuracy of the results are investigated.
In this work the numerical results of the flow around a 5:1 rectangular cylinder at Reynolds numbers 3 000 and 40 000, zero angle of attack and smooth incoming flow condition are presented. Implicit Large Eddy Simulations (ILES) have been performed with a high-order accurate spatial scheme and an implicit high-order accurate time integration method. The spatial approximation is based on a discontinuous Galerkin (dG) method, while the time integration exploits a linearly-implicit Rosenbrock-type Runge-Kutta scheme. The aim of this work is to show the feasibility of high-fidelity flow simulations with a moderate number of DOFs and large time step sizes. Moreover, the effect of different parameters, i.e., dimension of the computational domain, mesh type, grid resolution, boundary conditions, time step size and polynomial approximation, on the results accuracy is investigated. Our best dG result at Re=3 000 perfectly agrees with a reference DNS obtained using Nek5000 and about 40 times more degrees of freedom. The Re=40 000 computations, which are strongly under-resolved, show a reasonable correspondence with the experimental data of Mannini et al. (2017) and the LES of Zhang and Xu (2020).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available