The Association Between Preclinical Medical Students' Perceptions of the Anatomy Education Environment and Their Learning Approaches

This study aimed to measure medical students' perceptions of the anatomy education environment and determine its association with their learning approaches. First- and second-year undergraduate medical students (N = 234) completed the Anatomy Education Environment Measurement Inventory and the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students. Results revealed that the students' perceptions of all the factors in the anatomy education environment were positive except for two areas-the anatomy learning resources and quality of histology learning facilities. The majority of students in the first year (62.3%) and second year (43.7%) adopted a deep learning approach. There was no significant association between most of the factors in the anatomy education environment and the students' learning approaches, except for the students' intrinsic interest in learning anatomy factor (p = 0.032). The anatomy education environment was positive for the medical students, and there was a prevalence of a deep learning approach among them. However, most of the factors in the anatomy education environment did not influence the students' learning approach. Given that the students' learning approach is a multifactorial construct, investigating the relationship between these two variables in longitudinal time points would provide better insight into the association between the anatomy educational climate and students' learning approaches.

Automated summary

This study investigated medical students' perceptions of the anatomy education environment and its association with their learning approaches. The results showed that most students had a positive perception of the anatomy education environment, although they had concerns about the anatomy learning resources and quality of histology learning facilities. The majority of students adopted a deep learning approach, but the factors in the anatomy education environment did not significantly affect their learning approaches. Further longitudinal research is needed to explore the relationship between these variables.