4.6 Article

Characterizing correlation within multipartite quantum systems via local randomized measurements

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.022407

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Quantum Engineering Program QEP-SF3, National Research Foundation of Singapore [NRF2017-NRF-ANR004 VanQuTe]
  2. Singapore Ministry of Education [RG162/19]
  3. foundational Questions Institute [FQXi-RFP-IPW1903]
  4. Fetzer Franklin Fund, a donor advised fund of Silicon Valley Community Foundation
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11875173, 1217040781]
  6. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019QY0702, 2017YFA0303903]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a more experimentally accessible quantifier of total correlations, which can be estimated using only single-qubit measurements, without the need for complex state tomography and coherent interference of multiple copies of a given state.
Given a quantum system on many qubits split into a few different parties, how many total correlations are there between these parties? Such a quantity, aimed to measure the deviation of the global quantum state from an uncorrelated state with the same local statistics, plays an important role in understanding multipartite correlations within complex networks of quantum states. Yet, the experimental access of this quantity remains challenging as it tends to be nonlinear, and hence often requires tomography which becomes quickly intractable as dimensions of relevant quantum systems scale. Here, we introduce a much more experimentally accessible quantifier of total correlations, which can be estimated using only single-qubit measurements. It requires far fewer measurements than state tomography, and obviates the need to coherently interfere multiple copies of a given state. Thus we provide a tool for proving multipartite correlations that can be applied to near-term quantum devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available