4.4 Article

Turbulent transport and entrainment in jets and plumes: A DNS study

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS
Volume 1, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.074301

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Turbulence Consortium [EP/L000261/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/M507878/1]
  3. Cambridge University Engineering Department
  4. Cambridge University Peterhouse College
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  6. EPSRC [EP/L000261/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L000261/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a direct numerical simulation (DNS) data set for a statistically axisymmetric turbulent jet, plume, and forced plume in a domain of size 40r(0) x 40r(0) x 60r(0), where r(0) is the source diameter. The data set supports the validity of the Priestley-Ball entrainment model in unstratified environments (excluding the region near the source) [Priestley and Ball, Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc. 81, 144 (1955)], which is corroborated further by the Wang-Law and Ezzamel et al. experimental data sets [Wang and Law, J. Fluid Mech. 459, 397 (2002); Ezzamel et al., ibid. 765, 576 (2015)], the latter being corrected for a small but influential coflow that affected the statistics. We show that the second-order turbulence statistics in the core region of the jet and the plume are practically indistinguishable from each other, although there are significant differences near the plume edge. The DNS data indicate that the turbulent Prandtl number is about 0.7 for both jets and plumes. For plumes, this value is a result of the difference in the ratio of the radial turbulent transport of radial momentum and buoyancy. For jets, however, the value originates from a different spread of the buoyancy and velocity profiles, in spite of the fact that the ratio of radial turbulent transport terms is approximately unity. The DNS data do not show any evidence of similarity drift associated with gradual variations in the ratio of buoyancy profile to velocity profile widths.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available