Journal
COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-022-00372-2
Keywords
-
Funding
- K.G. Jebsen Foundation
- Norwegian Petroleum Directorate
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Studies show that older U-Pb dates of zircon found in igneous rocks may be the result of contamination, while younger samples indicate truly inherited zircon. The level of radiation damage can distinguish between the two.
Many studies have reported U-Pb dates of zircon that are older than the igneous rocks that contain them, and they are therefore thought to be inherited from older rock complexes. Their presence has profound geodynamic implications and has been used to hypothesize about concealed micro-continents, continental crust beneath ocean islands, and recycling of continental material in the mantle beneath mid-ocean ridges. Here, we combine single zircon U-Pb dates and structural radiation damage determined by Raman spectroscopy from a Pliocene mid-ocean ridge gabbro and from Cenozoic igneous rocks to test whether radiation damage allows distinction between contamination and truly inherited zircon. We find that Precambrian zircon found in the Pliocene sample has accumulated substantially more radiation damage than could be explained if they had truly been inherited. In the Cenozoic samples, however, we find that the radiation damage of old grains corresponds with that of young magmatic zircon, suggesting they are genuinely inherited. True inherited zircon grains, that are older than the rocks in which they are found, may be discriminated from zircon grains that represent contamination by analysing radiation damage determined by Raman spectroscopy
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available