4.5 Article

Enrichment of the lung microbiome with gut bacteria in sepsis and the acute respiratory distress syndrome

Journal

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 1, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/NMICROBIOL.2016.113

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes for Health [UL1TR000433, K23HL130641, T32HL00774921, R01HL123515, UO1HL123031, U01HL098961, R01HL114447]
  2. Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research
  3. Host Microbiome Initiative of the University of Michigan
  4. University of Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sepsis and the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are major causes of mortality without targeted therapies. Although many experimental and clinical observations have implicated gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of these diseases, culture-based studies have failed to demonstrate translocation of bacteria to the lungs in critically ill patients. Here, we report culture-independent evidence that the lung microbiome is enriched with gut bacteria both in a murine model of sepsis and in humans with established ARDS. Following experimental sepsis, lung communities were dominated by viable gut-associated bacteria. Ecological analysis identified the lower gastrointestinal tract, rather than the upper respiratory tract, as the likely source community of post-sepsis lung bacteria. In bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from humans with ARDS, gut-specific bacteria (Bacteroides spp.) were common and abundant, undetected by culture and correlated with the intensity of systemic inflammation. Alveolar TNF-alpha, a key mediator of alveolar inflammation in ARDS, was significantly correlated with altered lung microbiota. Our results demonstrate that the lung microbiome is enriched with gut-associated bacteria in sepsis and ARDS, potentially representing a shared mechanism of pathogenesis in these common and lethal diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available