4.6 Article

Highly stable and high-performance MgHPO4 surface-modified Ni-rich cathode materials for advanced lithium ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 10, Issue 31, Pages 16555-16569

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta08441k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2021R1F1A1055979]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1F1A1055979] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a novel strategy to improve the cathode material of NCM for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is proposed. The Mg-doped and Li3PO4-coated NCM cathode material shows advanced discharge capacity, rate capability, and cycling performance. The dual-modification of MgHPO4 on the NCM particle effectively prevents the phase transition, providing potential for commercialization acceleration.
A Ni-rich layered cathode (LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2, NCM) is a highly promising cathode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, LIBs face crucial challenges of its structural degradation and interfacial instability during the cycling process. In this paper, we successfully design a Mg-doped and Li3PO4-coated NCM cathode material. The electrochemical results reveal that MgHPO4-modified NCM shows not only an advanced initial discharge capacity of 203.5 mA h g(-1) but also the highest rate capability of 89.4% at 6.0C. More importantly, MgHPO4-modified NCM maintains a superior cycling performance of 86.3% after 100 cycles at 25 degrees C. Most importantly, MgHPO4 dual-modification on the NCM particle can immunize against the phase transition from the layered phase to the rock-salt phase. Therefore, this study proposes a novel strategy for improving the NCM cathode material to accelerate its commercialization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available