4.6 Article

Ultrasensitive flower-like TiO2/Ag substrate for SERS detection of pigments and melamine

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages 6958-6965

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra08128d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11764046, 11764047]
  2. Zunyi science and technology bureau [ZSKHHZZ-2019-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flower-shaped TiO2 nanomaterials (FLNMs) were synthesized via hydrothermal method and Ag nanoparticles (NPs) were deposited using electron beam evaporation. The SERS properties of FLNMs were investigated using various biological pigments and displayed ultrasensitivity and high reproducibility. Additionally, the FLNMs showed potential for detecting melamine with a detection limit significantly lower than the strictest standards worldwide.
TiO2 flower like nanomaterials (FLNMs) are fabricated via a hydrothermal method and Ag nanoparticles (NPs) are deposited via electron beam evaporation. Several biological pigments (CV, R6G and RhB) are selected as target molecules to investigate their surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) property. The results demonstrate ultrasensitivity and high reproducibility. They reveal that the limit of detection (LOD) is 4.17 x 10(-16) M and the enhancement factor (EF) is 2.87 x 10(10) for CV, and the LOD is 5.01 x 10(-16) M and 7.94 x 10(-14) M for R6G and RhB, respectively. To assess the reproducibility on TiO2/Ag FLNMs SERS substrates, they are tested with 1.0 x 10(-13) M of CV, 1.0 x 10(-13) M of R6G and 1.0 x 10(-11) M of RhB, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSD) are less than 12.93%, 13.52% and 11.74% for CV, R6G and RhB, respectively. In addition, we carry out melamine detection and the LOD is up to 7.41 x 10(-10) M, which is over 1000 times lower than the severest standards in the world. Therefore, the obtained TiO2 FLNMs have potential application in detecting illegal food additives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available