4.6 Article

Insights on the mutational landscape of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant receptor-binding domain

Journal

CELL REPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100527

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. T32 ES007020/ES/NIEHS NIH
  2. SMART, Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes the mutational landscape of the Omicron variant and its impact on antibody escape and transmissibility. Using amino acid interaction networks, the researchers identify direct and indirect mutations driving increased escape breadth and depth in antibody epitopes. Additionally, they find evidence that certain Omicron RBD mutations disrupt conformational stability, potentially contributing to enhanced transmissibility.
The Omicron variant features enhanced transmissibility and antibody escape. Here, we describe the Omicron receptor-binding domain (RBD) mutational landscape using amino acid interaction (AAI) networks, which are well suited for interrogating constellations of mutations that function in an epistatic manner. Using AAI, we map Omicron mutations directly and indirectly driving increased escape breadth and depth in class 1-4 antibody epitopes. Further, we present epitope networks for authorized therapeutic antibodies and assess perturbations to each antibody's epitope. Since our initial modeling following the identification of Omicron, these predictions have been realized by experimental findings of Omicron neutralization escape from therapeutic antibodies ADG20, AZD8895, and AZD1061. Importantly, the AAI predicted escape resulting from indirect epitope perturbations was not captured by previous sequence or point mutation analyses. Finally, for several Omicron RBD mutations, we find evidence for a plausible role in enhanced transmissibility via disruption of RBD-down conformational stability at the RBDdown- RBDdown interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available